Fujimi 1/72 RF-86F Sabre
KIT #: | F-20 |
PRICE: | HK $60.00 |
DECALS: | Two options |
REVIEWER: | Richard F |
NOTES: |
HISTORY |
The F-86 Sabre is a famous jet with a long combat history.
For a good history of the Sabre as a fighter, take a look at this build right
here on MM:
http://www.modelingmadness.com/reviews/korean/cleaver/tmc3286.htm, or look
at the other builds and previews on the site.
The early F-86A was made into a recon aircraft, codenamed "Ashtray", but the
definitive version was based on the F-86F, and known as "Haymaker". Both types
had their guns replaced with three cameras. Two cameras were mounted in blisters
either side of the cockpit, and mirrors enabled them to photograph downwards
from openings in the bottom of the fuselage. A third camera was mounted in
between the viewing ports of the other two cameras. In US service, these
aircraft conducted a series of top secret overflights of the USSR and China in
the 1950s. They were so sensitive that each mission had to be approved by the
President.
Apart from the top secret USAF missions, RF-86Fs saw long service with Japan and
Korea. The JASDF Sabres were only replaced by RF-4Es in 1979 and the Koreans
reportedly kept using theirs for ten years after that.
If you go to Dayton Ohio you can see a USAF RF-86F in the collection there
(including on its webpage).
THE KIT |
Well,
it was news to me that there was a recon version of the Sabre so when I saw the
Fujimi kit at a decent price I bought it. That got me interested and a few hours
of googling later, I learned more about the secret overflights. Much of it was
only declassified in recent years.
From what I can tell, the Fujimi F-86 kit is considered the best in 1/72 scale.
I also have the Heller F-86F and many years ago I built the Matchbox kit. The
Heller kit is pretty good, but this Fujimi kit is clearly a step up in quality.
This kit has finely engraved panel lines and cleanly moulded detail parts like
the wheels, airbrake bays and cockpit features. It has a good instrument panel
and cockpit side panels, a three-piece ejection seat and two nicely done
Sidewinder missiles (which don't go with the recon version). Particularly
nice is the intake, made of two parts and with a separate engine inlet to
install deep inside the jet. True, the Heller kit isn't too far behind here, but
the Fujimi version looks like an easier build.
The clear parts are nice and clear and thin too.
The Fujimi kit seems to have the proper longer wing, compared against the Heller
F-86F which, I understand from reviews on MM, has the wrong, shorter wing. I
know different Sabres at different times had different wings.
I am not nearly an expert on the Sabre so if this is important to you, best to
check some references! I'm sure daboss will correct me if I misunderstood this.
(The Heller kit has the correct wings for the earlier versions of the F-86F
up to F-35 while all Japanese Sabres were F-86F-40 versions with longer wings.
Fujimi also does the earlier short wing versions. Ed)
Fujimi did a family of Sabres, so the recon version is simply another Sabre with
two small extra sprues. The first is clear, and has the three camera windows
with their streamlined mountings. These go under the fuselage. The other sprue
has four parts - two side blisters for the cameras, and two parts to blank off
the machine guns. Other than that, this kit is a standard Fujimi Sabre.
There are two decal options for this kit, both JASDF aircraft. The Sabre on the
box top is from the 501st Recon Squadron, while the other version, quite
similar, is from the "Air Defence Command HQ Flight Squadron". The decal sheet
includes the fake gun muzzles that were painted on to some of these RF-86s to
disguise the fact they flew unarmed.
CONCLUSIONS |
This is a great kit of a less well-known version of the Sabre. It doesn't come with US markings, but anyone with suitable references will be able to put together the right decals for a US plane. (Editor's Note: USAF RF-86s had different camera housings and were short wing variants so doing so will require a bit of scratchbuilding)
August 2009
If you would like your product reviewed fairly and quickly, please contact me or see other details in the Note to Contributors.