Hasegawa 1/72nd scale M4A3E8
Sherman
KIT #: |
31115 |
PRICE: |
$10.00 |
DECALS: |
Three options |
REVIEWER: |
Tim Reynaga |
NOTES: |
|
The iconic American tank of World
War II, the M4 Sherman was a successful but not particularly innovative or
powerful design. Best known for its mechanical reliability and ease of
operation, it was a solid, incremental improvement over the M3 Lee/Grant series
tanks it replaced. Designed in 1940, the
Sherman
still compared favorably with most of its German rivals when first deployed in
1942, but the tank was to become badly outclassed as more advanced types entered
the battlefield. Nicknamed “Ronsons” (after the cigarette lighter) for their
tendency to burn after a single hit, the medium Shermans were distinctly
inferior to the heavier German Panthers and Tigers they faced in Europe after
1944. Nevertheless, Allied forces built around the Sherman
eventually
overwhelmed the panzers with a combination of carefully planned tactics, air
support, and most of all by sheer numbers; while total Panther/Tiger production
amounted to about 2,100 units, the Sherman reached a total production of over
50,000 vehicles. Obsolescent by the beginning of the Korean War in 1950, later
models of the tank saw service with the
U.S.
Army in that conflict as well.
The tank depicted
here is one of the well-known "tiger face” painted machines of the 89th Tank
Battalion,
U.S.
2nd Infantry Division,
Korea,
during Operation Ripper in 1951. Ripper was a massive United Nations offensive
launched on
March 6, 1951
intended to destroy the Communist Chinese and North Korean armies around
Seoul,
Hongchon, and Chunchon. It followed up on Operation Killer, which had pushed
Communist forces north of the
Han River,
and sought to bring UN troops up to the 38th parallel. The offensive opened with
the largest artillery bombardment of the Korean War. U.S. forces crossed the Han
and, along with South Korean units, advanced quickly to liberate
Seoul
just over a week later and with Hongchon and Chunchon falling soon thereafter.
Although again outclassed, this time by Communist T-34 (85mm) tanks, the 76mm
gun armed
Shermans
performed well. By the time Operation Ripper concluded on April 4 UN forces had
succeeded in taking all of their main geographic objectives, although most of
the Chinese and Korean forces had escaped to fight another day.
Hasegawa's 1/72nd
scale Sherman was one of their earlier releases, dating back at least to the
early 1970s (when I built my first one). It is an inexpensive, easy to assemble
kit with good detail and sharp moldings, although its single piece rubber band
style tracks and mediocre crew figures are definite weaknesses. The model
represents a M4A3E8 (“Easy Eight”) Sherman with the Ford GAA V-8 gasoline
engine, welded hull, with widetrack Horizontal Volute Spring Suspension (HVSS)
and fitted with the 76mm M1 gun in an early T23 turret. Until Trumpeter's M4A3E8
release in 2007, it was the only
Sherman
of this variant available in 1/72 scale.
The problem is, it’s
not really 1/72 scale. To start with, the turret is a little big, scaling out to
1/71. The hull is about a millimeter too wide, also scaling to about 1/71. This
doesn’t sound like much, but the Hasegawa designers, apparently noticing the
discrepancy, narrowed the horizontal upper side fenders to try to compensate for
the too wide hull, so while the overall width is approximately correct, the hull
is still too wide and the fenders are noticeably too slender. The overall length
of the hull is off as well, being about 1/68 scale. The running gear come in at
approximately 1/70, making the model stand about a scale foot too high. These
scale issues, because they also involve proportion problems, are basically
unfixable... but if you can live with the inaccuracies, the completed model does
look like a
Sherman!
Construction of Hasegawa’s little
M4 is conventional, starting with the lower hull and bogey wheel assemblies
followed by the upper hull and turret. Despite the scale issues, everything fits
together nicely. Parts are sharply cast and well-appointed with mostly accurate
details. The .50 cal machine gun for the turret is quite nice (although I ended
up not using it), and the delicately cast vent screen on the engine deck is a
thing of beauty. There are simplifications such as the exhaust pipes, pioneer
tools, and
lifting points molded directly to the hull and turret parts, but the
overall effect is good.
I decided to make
some improvements, but first the old stuff had to be cleared away. The exhaust
pipes were left unchanged due to their inconspicuous location, but those molded
tools on the hull just had to go. I also scraped away the solid-molded lifting
points on the hull as well as the inaccurate little nubs for mounting the
headlights. The tow mounts on the final drive housing (kit part No. 16) were cut
away too. On the turret, I removed the solid-molded lifting rings as well as the
oversized mounting points for the .50 cal machine gun and the spotlight.
Replacements for
these poorly done details were mostly scratchbuilt. Starting with the hull, I
made new lifting points from bent wire and stuck them into small holes I had
drilled into the deck to accept them. Tiny dabs of Squadron Green Putty applied
to the joins represent attachment welds. Similarly, lift handles were added to
the engine deck doors using smaller diameter wire. The shovel and axe on the
right side of the rear hull came from an
ESCI
1/72 scale M4A1 Sherman kit, as did the track tensioning wrench on the upper
rear of the engine deck and the forward hull mounted tow points. That excellent
kit also contributed the headlights, which were improved by boring out the
plastic faces and inserting MV Products glass lenses. I discarded the kit tail
lights in favor of new ones made from plastic rod. Guards for
the hull lights and tool mounting clasps were fabricated from lead foil
taken from an old wine bottle cut into thin strips and bent to shape.
This real
metal material is a great way to simulate scale sheet metal components, but I
had to make sure to paint them carefully so that none of the bare metal remained
exposed to the air. This is important since the alloy used for wine lead can
oxidize over time, making the parts look like some sort of weird metal
cauliflower... not very realistic!
The small stowage rack on the
rear of the model mounts to the deck with thick tabs which are supposed to fill
the large unrealistic notches cut into in the armored hull to accommodate them.
It doesn’t look quite right, but I left them alone and mounted the kit rack as
designed. The rack itself is a little chunky, so I thinned it and replaced the
solid sides with open supports made from strip plastic. As for stowage, the kit
provided none except a completely unconvincing rolled tarp intended to be
mounted on the engine deck, so I had to look elsewhere. I tossed the tarp and
added four jerry cans from Hasegawa’s 1/72 Field
Camp
Equipment
Set. These
U.S.
style cans are well executed, but I improved them by replacing the solid plastic
handles with wire. The K-ration box was made from a 1/35 scale Verlinden paper
part reduced in a photocopier to 1/72 and wrapped with lead foil straps. The
stowage was completed with an old Fujimi 1/76 ammo box, a length of model
railroad chain and some beige sewing thread “rope” to secure the items in place.
Moving on to the
turret, I replaced the lifting rings on the turret sides and top with bent wire
and added one on each side of the gun mantlet as well. As with the hull, they
went into small holes drilled to accept them, the joins dressed up with green
putty welds. I also added a pistol port to the left side of the turret. I don’t
know if some turrets were manufactured
without them, but the Hasegawa turret didn’t have a pistol port at all. I
made the little door from a square of scrap plastic with the sides beveled. This
was then framed with a fairing of Squadron putty. The kit spotlight was replaced
with one from the
ESCI
Sherman
with an MV Products glass lens and mounted with a bent wire. The .50 cal machine
gun and its pedestal mount were improved with plastic rod, sheet, and wire
details—although I later removed the gun when I added the crew figures, leaving
only the pedestal. The storage rack for the machine gun on the turret bustle was
scratchbuilt from plastic sheet. The turret hatches were enhanced with small
diameter wire handles, and the same material was used to fabricate the periscope
guards. Wire was also employed for the antennas, with the aerial spring bases
simulated with wire shaped around a pin. Other turret details included plastic
mounting strips for the gun mantlet canvas cover and a tiny emergency gunsight
made from wine-lead sheet.
The most significant
change I made to the model was to improve the tracks. The parts provided by
Hasegawa are those one piece soft plastic lengths typical of 1970s-era tank
kits. Impervious to polystyrene plastic cement, these things have to be
assembled by fitting tabs on one end through holes on the other, then melting
the protruding tips to secure them. Then they must be stretched over the
completed sprockets and road wheels like rubber bands. I don’t know why this
approach was so popular with manufacturers; I remember the frustration as a kid
of ruining tracks when I couldn’t properly control the melting, or breaking them
under the tension of fitting them around the wheels—and then not being able to
repair them because the tabs had snapped off! Even if they survive the assembly
process, the soft material used is not very convincing; these elastic tracks
don't bend realistically at the hinges between links, and they tend to bow in
the center where they wrap around the sprockets. Flexible rubber just doesn’t
look like steel link!
The soft kit track
parts are apparently intended to represent the Horizontal Volute Spring
Suspension (HVSS) T-80 all steel, double-pin type tracks, but they bear only a
passing resemblance to the real things. While detail on the outside of the kit
parts is reasonable, the inner surfaces are completely smooth except for the
guide teeth. They are also a bit too thin for the larger than 1/72 model. Since
I couldn’t figure out a way to make these look right, I hoped to replace them
with the excellent hard plastic tracks from the
ESCI
M4A1 kit I had been raiding for parts. Unfortunately, this was not possible as
the
ESCI
Sherman
tracks were wrong type. The T48 rubber chevron
tracks for the Vertical Volute Spring Suspension (VVSS) in the
ESCI
kit had double sets of guide teeth framing a central wheel, but I needed tracks
for the HVSS type, which had a single row of guide teeth sandwiched between
paired bogey wheels. Searching through my stash, I found an
ESCI
M-48 Patton kit with T97E2 tracks
that I thought could be adapted to resemble
Sherman T-84 rubber chevron units.
These were of course a bit too wide for the smaller Sherman and they had no
detail on the insides, but the link and length tracks were nicely detailed on
the outer surfaces—and they were made of hard plastic! To make the Patton tracks
resemble the
Sherman
T-84s, I cut them lengthwise down the middle and removed the center section to
narrow them. Cementing the halves back together, I added small.010 X .040 inch
plastic strips across the inside surface to simulate individual links. Finally,
individual guide teeth cut from the
ESCI
Sherman
tracks were added to the centers of the strips. The resulting tracks are a
little overscale for 1/72, but since the tank itself is also oversized, they
look about right.
I used the Patton
tracks to improve the spare track links mounted on the hull sides too. The
spares are nicely done, but for some reason Hasegawa chose to depict the rubber
chevrons on them as depressions in the links. This is completely wrong, so I
added rubber chevrons shaved from Patton parts to correct them. It also makes
them match up better with the new tracks.
I built this tank to represent
one of the famous “tiger face” Shermans of Company C, 89th Tank Battalion, U.S.
2nd Infantry Division near the Han River, Korea during Operation Ripper in
March, 1951. According to Zaloga and Balin’s
Tank Warfare in
Korea
1950-53,
“This was one of the
first examples of the tiger faces and was designed by Lt. Fred Wilkins and
painted by Sgt. Joe McCoy. The scheme included a basic yellow background with
small squiggles in olive drab or black. The yellow extended a short way back on
the turret (about 18-24 inches) and about 18 inches on the hull sides.”
The outlandish paint schemes seen
on many vehicles participating in Operation Ripper were apparently intended to
both spook the supposedly superstitious Chinese and Koreans and boost the morale
of their own crews. The idea may have been to take advantage of Chinese
astrology, 1950-51 being a “Metal Tiger” year. If so, they got it wrong; 1951
was indeed a Metal Tiger year, but Chinese astrology is based upon the lunar
year which ran from February 17, 1950 through February 5, 1951. By the time
Operation Ripper was launched on March 6 the lunar year had moved on—to the Year
of the Rabbit! Of course they could have adjusted the schemes, but somehow
rabbit-painted tanks just wouldn’t have been quite as intimidating...
Applying the dramatic
tiger face was not as difficult as it may appear. There are aftermarket decal
sheets available to accomplish this and other Korean War tigers, but applying
decals over large surfaces tends to cause no end of problems (at least for me).
Besides, the simpler schemes such as this really aren’t that hard to paint
freehand. So, as with the original, this tiger face was hand painted. There’s no
trick to it, just work slowly with well thinned paints. Following a base coat of
Model Master Olive Drab (FS34087) and applying the kit decal stars, I airbrushed
a coat of flat yellow over the fronts of the hull and turret. Next, the black
mouth was applied by brush, followed by the white eyes and teeth, then the red
tongue, mouth, and eye outlines. Olive drab squiggles applied with a fine brush
over the remaining yellow completed the scheme.
Weathering was
minimal since the tiger faces were painted immediately before Ripper, and photos
of these tanks at the time show fairly clean vehicles with just a light covering
of road grime and dust. I contented myself with a thin dark gray wash and some
tan paint “dust”.
The kit supplied crew figures
were crudely done, so I tossed them and initially completed the tank with the
hatches buttoned up. I later picked up a set of Milicast’s resin “American
AFV
Crew in Casual Poses #2” whose World War Two-era uniforms also work well for
Korea.
Labeled as 1/76th scale, the figures measure 25mm high, making them about 5 feet
11 inches tall in 1/72nd scale... or 5 feet 10 inches in 1/71, or 5 feet 9
inches in 1/70, depending on how you scale the vehicle! The excellent but
slightly exaggerated sculptin of these tankers suits them well to this overscale
Sherman,
so I opened up the turret hatches and dropped them in.
The weird scaling of
this model makes it look odd next to my other, more accurate, 1/72
Shermans,
so to make the difference less conspicuous I put it on its own base. The wood is
a decorative oak wall light switchplate which (to the dismay of my wife) I
liberated from its former use and covered with Das Pronto modeling clay.
Woodland Scenics model railroad static grass and weeds, along with a bit of sand
and few small pebbles, complete the groundwork.
Hasegawa’s 1/72
Sherman is a well detailed, inexpensive, and readily available kit, but it
suffers from scale/proportion issues and poor tracks. The only M4A3E8 Sherman
available in the scale when I built this one way back in the early 1990s, it has
since been eclipsed by more accurate M4A3E8 releases by Trumpeter, Dragon, and
UM (Unimodel). Any of these would be a better starting point today for a late
model M4. Still, if you aren’t too hung up on accuracy and are willing to do
some extra work, Hasegawa’s venerable kit can be built into a good looking
little
Sherman.
Armour
of the Korean War 1950-53
Simon Dunstan, Osprey
Vanguard No. 27,
London,
1982.
Sherman
– History of the American Medium Tank
R.P. Hunnicutt, Presidio Press,
Novato,
CA,
1978.
Tank Warfare in
Korea
1950-53
Steven J. Zaloga and George Balin,
Concord
Publications,
Hong Kong,
1994.
Tim Reynaga
September
2012
If you would like your product reviewed fairly and fairly quickly, please contact the editor or see other details in the
Note to
Contributors.
Back to the Main Page
Back to the Review
Index Page